Intraperitoneal Cis-Platinum/Intravenous Cyclophosphamide Versus Intravenous Cis-Platinum/ Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Non-Measurable (Optimal) Disease Stage III Ovarian Cancer
Research committees
Publication Information Expand/Collapse
2020
PMid: PMID32352530 | PMC number: PMC7193331
2017
PMid: PMID28586789; PMC5710507
2009
Racial disparities in survival of patients with sex-specific cancers treated on Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials. PMC2724852; PMID: 19584328
Minority report: how best to analyze clinical trial data to address disparities
2008
The Southwest Oncology Group: progress in cancer research [PMID18929152]
2002
Prediction of the need for red cell transfusion in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients undergoing platinum-based treatment.
1996
Phase III study of IP cisplatin plus IV cyclophosphamide vs IV cisplatin plus IV cyclophosphamide in optimal disease stage III ovarian cancer: An Intergroup study 0051 (SWOG-GOG-ECOG).
Intraperitoneal cislatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer.
1995
Phase III study of intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin (CDDP)/intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CPA) vs IV CDDP/IV CPA in patients (pts) with optimal disease stage III ovarian cancer: A SWOG-GOG-ECOG Intergroup Study (INT-0051)